Comparing
How does mobility differ from one region to the next?
This comparison complements the local analysis and broadens the perspective on local mobility. It highlights differences and patterns and illustrates how mobility plays out itself in different regions.
This makes it easier to interpret results and identify patterns. It also highlights where strengths lie and what developments are possible under different conditions.
The comparisons are an invittation to discover connections or correlations and ask new questions about one region or another.
What becomes noticeable while comparing
What the analyses can be used for
Gauging the quality and accessibility of daily needs.
Accessibility to key everyday destinations such as supermarkets, schools, or medical facilities can be systematically analyzed and compared across neighborhoods. This makes it clear where daily life can be easily managed—and where travel times are particularly long.
Realistic assessment mobility options
Accessibility can be compared across different modes of transportation. This makes it possible to assess which routes are practical and where certain mobility options are limited.
Establishing a common ground for discussions regarding mobility
The visual representation makes mobility easy to understand and allows for a direct entry into the discussion—even without any background knowledge of urban planning.
Current Analyses and Insights
From local services to leisure activities and social inclusion – mobi.mapr can be used to address a wide range of issues. Here you’ll find the latest posts.
FAQs
Comparing reveals differences and patterns.
The next step is to use this information to identify relevant questions and starting points for implementing changes locally.